Threat report · updated October 22, 2026

What is hitting businesses like yours, and what applies to you

Seven threats ranked by what they are costing North American organizations, the compliance frameworks that apply to you, and free training for your team. Compiled from published reports, refreshed quarterly.

Current threat landscape

Seven threats, ranked

One line each. Open a row for the detail, who it targets, and what the practical bar is right now.

  • 2 critical
  • 3 high
  • 2 elevated
  1. Critical Ransomware and recovery denial Crews hit backups, identity and hypervisors first so there is nothing to restore. Recovery costs keep rising. $1.7M average recovery cost, before any ransom

    Still the most financially damaging threat to mid-market businesses, and 48% of all breaches now involve it (Verizon DBIR 2026). The economics have shifted: the median demand fell to about $698K and only 48% of victims paid, the second-lowest rate on record, yet the average recovery cost rose 11% to $1.7M before any ransom (Sophos State of Ransomware 2026). Encryption succeeded in 56% of attacks, and 79% began with a compromised identity. The 2025 pattern Mandiant calls recovery denial: groups running Akira and Qilin went after backup infrastructure, identity services and virtualization management planes before encrypting anything, so the victim has nothing to restore from (M-Trends 2026).

    Who it targets

    • Healthcare
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Professional services
    • Education

    The bar right now

    Backups the attacker cannot reach: immutable or offline, under separate credentials, and actually restored from on a schedule; MFA and separate admin accounts on the backup and hypervisor consoles; an incident plan that assumes the network, the identity provider and the backups are all down.

  2. Critical Vulnerability exploitation, now the most common way in Exploits overtook stolen credentials this year. Live example: PHP2Shell, two unauthenticated RCE bugs in PHP. 31% of breaches start with an exploited vulnerability

    For the first time in nineteen years of the DBIR, vulnerability exploitation is the top initial access vector: 31% of breaches, ahead of stolen credentials, while the median time to patch slipped from 32 to 43 days (Verizon DBIR 2026). Mandiant saw the same thing from the incident-response side, with exploits the leading infection vector for the sixth year running at 32% (M-Trends 2026). Zero-days exploited before public disclosure rose 42%, and 40% of the vulnerabilities China-nexus groups exploited were in edge devices that typically go unmonitored (CrowdStrike 2026). The current case is PHP2Shell: CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, both CVSS 9.2, disclosed October 21, 2026. They let an unauthenticated request run code on any server that serves PHP over the web (Apache mod_php, PHP-FPM, php-cgi and the like), on versions going back to PHP 5.4. Fixes shipped the same day in PHP 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 and 8.2.35, with source backports for the end-of-life 7.4 to 8.1 branches. Proof-of-concept code was public within a day and several vendors reported exploitation attempts, one of them four days before disclosure. Most small-business websites, including anything on WordPress, run PHP.

    Who it targets

    • Any business with a website
    • WordPress and PHP hosting
    • VPN and firewall users
    • On-prem infrastructure

    The bar right now

    Patch PHP to 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 or 8.2.35 this week, and ask your host or agency which version your site runs; an end-of-life branch needs the backport or a migration. More generally: patch anything internet-facing on a days-not-weeks cadence, use the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as the priority list, and retire appliances the vendor no longer updates.

  3. High AI-enabled social engineering and agentic attacks Phishing is indistinguishable from real mail, the phone is an attack vector, and AI agents run intrusions. +89% attacks by AI-enabled adversaries, year over year

    Attacks by AI-enabled adversaries rose 89% year over year, fake-CAPTCHA lures 563% (CrowdStrike 2026). Voice phishing intrusions doubled again in the first half of 2026 (CrowdStrike Threat Hunting Report 2026). Reported cyber-crime losses hit a record $20.9B in 2025, up 26%, with business email compromise at $3.05B across 24,768 complaints and more than $30M of it attributed to AI-assisted tactics (FBI IC3 2025). Verizon, working with Anthropic on threat-actor data, found 44% of AI-assisted initial access was phishing and 32% vulnerability exploitation (DBIR 2026). Attackers using AI agents to automate reconnaissance, intrusion and extortion end to end have been documented in incident disclosures by AI vendors since late 2025.

    Who it targets

    • All industries
    • Finance teams
    • Executive teams

    The bar right now

    Out-of-band verification for any payment or credential change, no exceptions for executives; phishing-resistant MFA; training that covers voice and video, not just email.

  4. High Identity attacks and help-desk social engineering Stolen credentials, session hijacking and help-desk resets have replaced malicious attachments as the way in. 22 sec median hand-off from first access to a second crew

    82% of initial-access detections are now malware-free: valid credentials, trusted identity flows and approved SaaS integrations instead of malicious attachments (CrowdStrike 2026). Average eCrime breakout time fell to 29 minutes, the fastest observed 27 seconds. Access brokers hand a foothold to a second group in a median 22 seconds, down from over eight hours in 2022 (M-Trends 2026). Scattered Spider relied almost entirely on talking help-desk staff into self-service password resets, and 79% of ransomware incidents began with a compromised identity (Sophos 2026).

    Who it targets

    • Cloud-first organizations
    • Remote workforces
    • SaaS-heavy teams

    The bar right now

    Phishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2 or passkeys) for everyone with admin or finance access; identity verification before any help-desk reset; conditional access that notices a new device or country.

  5. High Supply chain and third-party attacks One vendor compromise, or one stolen integration token, becomes hundreds of downstream data thefts. 48% of breaches involve a third party

    Breaches involving a third party or the supply chain jumped 60% and now account for 48% of the total (Verizon DBIR 2026). Recent campaigns hit the connective tissue: stolen OAuth tokens for SaaS integrations turned single vendor compromises into hundreds of downstream data thefts, and self-propagating malware reached the open-source package ecosystem. If a vendor holds your data, or a token that can reach it, their security posture is part of your attack surface.

    Who it targets

    • SaaS users
    • MSP clients
    • Enterprise

    The bar right now

    An inventory of every integration and the data it can reach; least-privilege scopes on OAuth grants; vendor security questions in procurement, not after the fact.

  6. Elevated Cloud and SaaS exposure Misconfiguration, permissive IAM and one admin account without MFA are still the entry points. 23% of cloud compromises began with a phone call

    The most common way into a cloud environment in 2025 was voice phishing, at 23% of cloud compromises Mandiant investigated (M-Trends 2026): someone talked an admin out of a credential or a reset. Misconfigurations, overly permissive IAM policies and exposed storage remain the technical entry points, and large-scale data-theft campaigns against SaaS platforms showed that one weak integration or one admin account without MFA is enough. Most breaches are not sophisticated: they exploit basics that were never locked down.

    Who it targets

    • Cloud-native
    • Multi-cloud
    • Startups

    The bar right now

    MFA on every admin account with no legacy-auth exceptions; a quarterly review of who can see what; alerts on public storage and new API keys.

  7. Elevated Nation-state pre-positioning State groups sit inside telecom and infrastructure holding access, often via ordinary businesses’ edge gear. 40% of China-nexus exploited vulnerabilities were in edge devices

    The Cyber Centre assesses China as the most sophisticated and active state cyber threat to Canada, and judges that state actors are very likely pre-positioning in critical infrastructure for future disruptive operations (CCCS National Cyber Threat Assessment 2025-26). 40% of the vulnerabilities China-nexus groups exploited in 2025 were in edge devices that typically lack monitoring (CrowdStrike 2026), and Mandiant attributes much of the rise in dwell time to long-term espionage and North Korean IT-worker operations (M-Trends 2026). This matters beyond critical infrastructure: these campaigns route through the unpatched routers and firewalls of ordinary businesses. Canada answered in June 2026 with the Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, which will bring mandatory incident reporting to designated operators once it is brought into force.

    Who it targets

    • Telecom
    • Critical infrastructure
    • Government suppliers

    The bar right now

    Replace end-of-life routers and firewalls; log and review outbound traffic from network gear; treat the joint CISA and CCCS advisories as a patch list.

Sources CrowdStrike Global Threat Report 2026 Mandiant M-Trends 2026 Verizon DBIR 2026 FBI IC3 2025 Annual Report CCCS National Cyber Threat Assessment 2025-26 Sophos State of Ransomware 2026 PHP2Shell advisory (CVE-2026-109618, CVE-2026-109619) CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

Compliance frameworks

Which frameworks apply to you

25 frameworks across Canada, the United States, the EU and specific industries. Pick where you operate and what you handle, then open a row for the detail and the source.

Where you operate
What you handle (any of)

Showing 25 of 25

Canada 7

PIPEDA In forceIn force; Bill C-36 would replace it All private-sector organizations operating across provincial borders

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. Federal private-sector privacy law governing how businesses collect, use, and disclose personal information. Still the law of the land: its proposed replacement, Bill C-36, was tabled in June 2026 and has not passed.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
Bill C-36 (PPCDA) ComingTabled June 2026, awaiting second reading Every organization PIPEDA covers today, once it passes

Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act. Canada’s third attempt to replace PIPEDA, after Bill C-11 and Bill C-27 died on the Order Paper. Tabled June 15, 2026, with administrative penalties of up to $10 million; it has not moved past first reading as of October 2026 and does not revive the AI and Data Act. PIPEDA remains in force until it passes and is proclaimed.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
Quebec Law 25 In forceFully in force since Sept 2024 Any business handling Quebec residents' personal information

Quebec's modernized private-sector privacy law, phased in from 2022 through 2024 and now fully in force, including data portability. Requires a designated privacy officer, breach reporting, privacy impact assessments, and carries significant administrative penalties.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
PHIPA (Ontario) In forceCurrent Healthcare providers, hospitals and pharmacies in Ontario

Personal Health Information Protection Act. Ontario's health-sector privacy law governing custodians of personal health information.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
CCCS Guidance VoluntaryOngoing, recommended All Canadian organizations

The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security publishes baseline security controls, advisory alerts, and sector-specific guidance for Canadian organizations.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
OPC Privacy Toolkit VoluntaryCurrent Businesses seeking PIPEDA compliance guidance

Office of the Privacy Commissioner compliance and training tools. Practical guidance for PIPEDA compliance, including self-assessment tools.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
CCSPA (Bill C-8) ComingRoyal Assent June 2026; not yet in force Critical infrastructure operators in federally regulated sectors

Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act. Bill C-8 received Royal Assent on June 15, 2026. Its Telecommunications Act amendments took effect immediately; the Act itself starts on a date set by the Governor in Council, and as of October 2026 no commencement order, regulations or list of designated operators has been published. When it starts: mandatory cybersecurity programs, incident reporting and compliance obligations for operators in telecom, finance, energy and transportation.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)

United States 8

NIST CSF 2.0 VoluntaryVersion 2.0, February 2024 All organizations; voluntary and widely adopted

NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The reference voluntary framework, organized around six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Version 2.0 added the Govern function and expanded supply chain guidance.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
SOC 2 Type II In forceCurrent, AICPA SaaS companies, service providers, any organization handling client data

Service Organization Control reports evaluating controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Type II reports cover a sustained period of operation.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
PCI DSS 4.0.1 In forcev4.0.1 is the only active version Any organization that stores, processes or transmits card data

Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. The transition is complete: all future-dated v4 requirements became mandatory on March 31, 2025, and v4.0.1 is the only active version. The Council began work on the next version in 2026 (request for comments closed July 2026) and published a mapping to NIST CSF 2.0 in July 2026; no successor date has been set.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
HIPAA In forceSecurity Rule overhaul pushed to 2027 Healthcare providers, insurers and their business associates

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Mandatory security and privacy protections for protected health information. HHS proposed a Security Rule overhaul in January 2025 (mandatory encryption, MFA, asset inventories, annual penetration tests); after provider groups asked for it to be withdrawn, HHS moved the final-rule target to July 2027. The existing Security Rule stays in effect.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
CMMC 2.0 In forcePhase 1 live; Phase 2 suspended July 2026 Department of Defense contractors and subcontractors

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification. Three levels: Foundational, Advanced, Expert. Phase 1 (self-assessments in new contracts) began in November 2025. Phase 2, which would have required third-party assessments from November 10, 2026, was suspended on July 13, 2026 pending a task-force review; no new date had been set as of October 2026. NIST SP 800-171 and the DFARS safeguarding clause still apply in the meantime.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
CISA CPGs VoluntaryVersion 2.0, December 2025 Critical infrastructure; a recommended baseline for anyone

Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals. Voluntary, prioritized security practices for critical infrastructure, designed as a quick-start guide for organizations that need to know where to begin. Version 2.0 reorganizes the goals under the six NIST CSF 2.0 functions, adds governance, and folds the former OT-only goals into shared IT and OT goals.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
FTC Act, Section 5 In forceActive enforcement All US businesses, as de facto enforcement

The FTC uses its authority over unfair or deceptive practices to enforce data security. There is no specific cybersecurity statute, but the FTC has taken action against hundreds of companies for inadequate security practices.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 VoluntaryVersion 1.0; 1.1 final expected 2026 All organizations; voluntary

Voluntary framework for managing privacy risk, designed to complement the Cybersecurity Framework. Organized around Identify, Govern, Control, Communicate, Protect. A 1.1 draft (April 2025) aligns it with CSF 2.0 and adds AI privacy risk; NIST says the final version is coming in 2026.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)

International and EU 6

GDPR In forceIn force since May 2018 Any organization processing EU residents’ data, wherever it is located

General Data Protection Regulation. The EU's comprehensive data protection law with extraterritorial reach.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
NIS2 Directive In forceIn force; 24 of 27 states have transposed Essential and important entities operating in the EU

Network and Information Security Directive 2. Expanded scope covering essential and important entities across 18 sectors. Mandatory incident reporting within 24 hours, supply chain security, and management accountability with personal liability for executives. Most member states now have a national law in force; in July 2026 the Commission referred Ireland, Spain, France and the Netherlands to the Court of Justice over late transposition.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
DORA In forceIn force since January 2025 EU financial entities and their ICT service providers

Digital Operational Resilience Act. EU regulation for financial-sector ICT risk management, covering risk frameworks, incident management, resilience testing, third-party risk, and information sharing.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 In force2022 edition; transition complete Oct 2025 Any organization seeking a globally recognized certification

International standard for information security management systems. Certifiable framework covering 93 controls across organizational, people, physical, and technological domains. Certificates against the 2013 edition expired October 31, 2025.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
EU Cyber Resilience Act In forceReporting duties in force since Sept 2026 Manufacturers and distributors of digital products in the EU

Mandatory cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements sold in the EU. Since September 11, 2026 manufacturers must report actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents: early warning within 24 hours, notification within 72, final report within 14 days. The product requirements (secure-by-design, conformity assessment, CE marking, security updates) apply from December 11, 2027.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
EU AI Act ComingHigh-risk duties deferred to Dec 2027 Any organization deploying or developing AI systems used in the EU

The first comprehensive AI regulation, applying by risk tier. Now applying: prohibited practices and AI literacy duties (since Feb 2025) and general-purpose AI obligations (since Aug 2025). The 2026 Digital Omnibus on AI deferred the high-risk system requirements to December 2, 2027 for standalone systems and August 2, 2028 for AI embedded in regulated products.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)

Industry-specific 4

HITRUST CSF In forceVersion 11.9, September 2026 Healthcare organizations and health tech companies

Health Information Trust Alliance Common Security Framework. Integrates requirements from HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and others into a single certifiable framework for healthcare organizations. The v11 series is updated several times a year; the September 2026 release adds AI-related controls.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
SWIFT CSCF In forceCSCF v2026, in effect for 2026 attestations Financial institutions on the SWIFT network

Customer Security Controls Framework. Mandatory security controls for all SWIFT users, updated annually. v2026 (published July 2025) has 32 controls, 26 of them mandatory; the main change is that back-office data flow security (control 2.4) moved from advisory to mandatory.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
CIS Controls v8.1 VoluntaryVersion 8.1, June 2024 All organizations; a practical baseline

Center for Internet Security Controls. A prioritized set of 18 defensive actions. Implementation Groups (IG1 to IG3) scale from essential hygiene to advanced. Widely used as a practical starting point for security programs.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)
CSA Group Standards In forceCurrent Canadian organizations seeking domestic certification

Canadian Standards Association cybersecurity standards. Adopts ISO 27001 for Canada and publishes additional guidance for Canadian organizations, including critical infrastructure.

Open the source (opens in a new tab)

Not sure which frameworks apply to your business?

  • 30 min free assessment
  • SOC 2 certified partners
  • 1 day business-day response